DNA Truth The Walking Paradox That May Be You!

Atheists and Skeptics have for years mentioned that there is absolutely no real evidence to prove that God is true and he alone is accountable for the creation! Evolution states that "We see evolution as based on the trial-and-error procedure of variation and organic choice of systems at all levels of complexity". And "The truth that mutations can corrupt DNA is essential for the Darwinian paradigm mainly because in order for an organism to ultimately evolve into an totally unique organism, alterations will have to be made for the creature's genome over time." The problems is there isn't any proof anyplace that any life-form has ever changed into an additional life-form in any fossil record anyplace in the world!

Then there are"Genetic similarities" among learn more  species interpreted by evolutionists as "DNA evidence" for evolution. The fact that human and chimp DNA are much more than 96% precisely the same is taken wrongly to mean that humans are genetically connected in lieu of just related to chimps and for that reason descended from a popular ancestor, obviously we realize that a widespread designer would possess a great deal of frequent style inside his creation just when an Artist creates a series of paintings even though not connected to one another directly have comparable traits to identify it's creator. This in no way PROVES something 1 way or the other, though its exciting how evolutionists make such massive leaps of faith in their theory without the need of any truth to back it up then claim that creationist's are working with faith as a crutch!

The trouble with Evolution and there is quite a bit! Is inside the clear reduce information of science that they look to refuse to repair when it really is found out it's not science and untrue, here's some to ponder: The Coelacanth ( Pronounced "seal-a-canth"a big fish) supposedly based on evolutionists disappeared in the fossil record together with the last with the dinosaurs. That was supposedly 65 million years ago. The problem is the fact that it truly is nevertheless alive and completely unchanged in our oceans nowadays. Where may be the evolution of this creature more than time if it by no means changed into anything else? It's still as God created it much less than 10,000 years ago! And what about God's "biggest Joke" towards these evolutionists? The platypus has a duck-like bill, swims with webbed feet, and lays eggs. However no one calls it a transitional creature amongst mammals and ducks. Possibly it would have to go extinct for thousands of years and be discovered later so they are able to deceive a future class of folks? What about their major theory on Dino's and Birds? Wasn't this in the time the finish all to prove the missing hyperlink (Transition)? "Archaeopteryx" (Pronounced like "R-k-op-ter-x") has long been held up as the great instance of transitional creatures, appearing to become component dinosaur and portion bird. Nonetheless, it is actually fully formed in and of itself, a complete animal with no half-finished components or useless growths. That's also the case for the other birds inside the evolutionary tree, does their shame never ever finish? Evolutionists just threw some of the several living and extinct species of birds subsequent to each other on their chart to make it appear like a "series of birds over time", this was really deceptive not to mention dishonest and begs the query: "If their appropriate why do they have to set up "straw-theory's" to knock over?" The same goes for Christians and creationist's that could possibly do the exact same thing! I fully grasp the jump to defend your theory but to deny scientific Law or kick the "proof"can down the road to avoid the facts is just dishonest research if there is any true analysis at all!

The theory ; get that? "Theory" of Evolution violates completely, two LAWS, not theory's but pure science. The Second Law of Thermodynamics ( Which can be the law of rising entropy, It applies to all systems, open or closed, and to all actions and chemical reactions, from molecules to galaxies. This can be a universal law. ) It says that things which get started out concentrated together spread out more than time or grow to be unorganized, in other words they develop aside from each other rather than enhancing their state more than time. The second issue is definitely the Law of Bio-genesis which was established by Louis Pasteur 3 years following Darwin's book was published, and just says that life only comes from life. No matter what these men and women say they Cannot overcome these challenges...ever, it is a WALL that can't be penetrated! Living cells will usually divide to create new cells, and fertilized eggs and seeds will usually create into animals and plants, but "chemicals" the life blood of evolution's theory can under no circumstances fall together randomly and make life appear out of nothing at all. Now try to remember this a scientific LAW not a theory but do evolutionist's care? No they just shrug their shoulders and move on having a "Well evolution can be a truth and there will likely be a way about it later within the future. So let's move on for the subsequent point...please?" Instead of stopping and thinking of the silliness of their positions!

Why is it that Amino acid molecules that form proteins, and nucleotide molecules that form DNA and RNA usually resist combining at any temperature? Not to mention the very simple fact that D.N.A. dilutes in any kind of water, this alone suggests that the so-called "Primal Soup" of evolution would dilute something begun as life automatically! It really is a fact of science that they combine only with all the aid of "mechanisms" within a living cell or simply a biochemist forcing it to accomplish so in an chemistry laboratory. Why is that? If evolution is at all accurate, why does it need to have our support? When the only evolution that can be done demands our support how can it be claimed that nature does it more than time? How can we accept these excuses from evolutionist's who use "TIME" because the cure all to prove it could come about when scientific Law says no?

It is actually a scientific truth that the essential proteins in D.N.A. can't be FORMED one particular at a time over time. Either they are all there at once, able to work all at when, or nothing at all takes place at all and they disintegrate, this is God's way of guarding his investment from crappy reasoning. But even though it could design and style proteins, mutation-natural selection would only work on a single at a time sporadically over numerous years without the assure that the following one would ever be alike. It's funny that D.N.A. has rubbed scientific information within the face of evolution for many years and we just simply overlook the apparent stupidity involved in their claims and excuses!